/
OPAttributeResolution

OPAttributeResolution


Overview

OIDC deals in "claims" instead of "attributes" but the concept is the same and the AttributeResolverConfiguration and (optionally) AttributeRegistryConfiguration are used as with SAML and CAS to pull in the appropriate data and encode it into JSON in responses.

The only special consideration for OIDC is the specialized encoding requirements, which are handled (as in SAML) either via "inline" AttributeEncoders, or by defining "transcoding" rules that map between IdPAttributes and JSON-encoded claims.

An example file, conf/examples/oidc-attribute-resolver.xml, is included that contains some examples of custom encoders, definitions that match the optional "default" claim rules, and suggested starting points for producing the "sub" claim (see also OPSubClaim).

Timing of Resolution

The Authorize, Token and Userinfo profile endpoints all trigger attribute resolution and filtering phases. The motivation for this is to maintain an implementation that is as stateless as possible to avoid complex clustering technologies. Each endpoint is able to resolve attributes independently and therefore attribute information need not be stored to server side. This also ensures up to date values for claims returned when an access token is refreshed for extended period of time.

(For long time Shibboleth deployers, this is somewhat analagous to the old days when SAML attribute queries were common.)

There are a few obvious downsides to this stateless approach. One is that, depending on the OIDC response type, the same attribute may be resolved more than once. This is particularly an issue if the resolution process is costly and the intention is only to authenticate the user. The ResultCache feature is helpful for this case.

A harder problem is when attribute resolution on the back-channel in the Token and Userinfo endpoints are unable to resolve attributes based on session/authentication/client information, as it is unavailable. This places additional requirements on the resolver configuration to fail gracefully in such cases. As an alternative, there is an encodedAttributes profile configuration property that instructs the Authorize endpoint to encode the attributes needed in later phases into the Authorization Code and/or Access Token directly, making them available to the Token and Userinfo endpoints. This naturally increases the size of the code/token but for specific cases may be tolerable.

Reserved Claims

Because OIDC is string-based, rather than reliant on XML and URIs for uniqueness, there are a number of arbitrary claim names that need to be avoided and will not be produced if used.

Please be aware that OAuth and OpenID are defined unsafely to leverage claim names that are strings rather than URIs. Thus, there are no mechanisms in place to ensure control and uniqueness over the naming of claims as can be done in SAML. As a result, we cannot guarantee that new specifications will not define new claim names and stomp on your use of new claim names that happen to collide.

The only real solution to this problem is simply to avoid “small/simple” names and, when using OIDC at least, avoid adding custom claims to the ID Token and leverage the UserInfo endpoint to produce them instead.

The following claim names are currently reserved (but note the warning above):

  • aud

  • iss

  • iat

  • exp

  • acr

  • auth_time

  • at_hash

  • c_hash

  • nonce

  • sid

The "sub" claim is also semi-reserved but does come from your configuration. However it has to meet certain requirements and so cannot just contain arbitrary data without risking severe consequences to RPs. It is analagous to violating the expectations of a SAML SP regarding the content of an Attribute, but with more consistently severe problems. Please refer to the dedicated page at OPSubClaim for specifics.

Transcoding Rules

The mappings from traditional LDAP (and SAML) attributes and OIDC claims is much less self-evident, but we have produced a set of plausible default rules that map from typical LDAP attributes to appropriate claims. These rules are not enabled by default, but can be found in conf/attributes/oidc-claim-rules.xml and imported into conf/attributes/default-rules.xml (with or without changes). That file also provides numerous examples to follow in building your own rules if desired.

Note that it's optional and not required to "combine" SAML and OIDC rules together. The system is intelligent enough to allow multiple "outbound" rules associated with the same IdPAttribute id with different transcoders involved.

The additional supported properties and transcoder types are described below. As with SAML, OIDC includes mechanisms to request claims, and so the transcoders support bidirectional mappings to allow decoding of requested JSON claims as well as encoding of IdPAttributes into JSON.

Common Properties

In addition to the generic properties, all OIDC transcoders support the following:

Name

Type

Default

Description

Name

Type

Default

Description

oidc.name

String

 

The claim name to map to and from (if absent, the IdPAttribute's id is used)

oidc.asArray

Boolean

false

Encodes and decodes multiple values as a JSON array

oidc.asInteger

Boolean

false

Encodes and decodes individual values as a JSON integer

oidc.asBoolean

Boolean

false

Encodes and decodes individual values as a Boolean

oidc.stringDelimiter

String

<space>

Encodes and decodes multiple values as a string with a specifie delimiter

oidc.nameFromSamlMetadata4.1

Boolean

false

The claim name may be set in the SAML metadata

SAML metadata-driven claim name

Since OP v4.1, the claim name may be set in the SAML metadata-driven style. If the OIDC transcoder property oidc.nameFromSamlMetadata is set to true, the metadata tag http://shibboleth.net/ns/attributes/naming/oidc can be used together with pattern <id> <name> to set a custom name for the claim.

Below is an example snippet of SAML metadata for test_rp that configures the claim name eppnNewNameForTesting for attribute with ID eduPersonPrincipalName:

... <md:EntityDescriptor entityID="test_rp"> <md:Extensions> <mdattr:EntityAttributes> <saml:Attribute Name="http://shibboleth.net/ns/attributes/naming/oidc" NameFormat="urn:oasis:names:tc:SAML:2.0:attrname-format:uri"> <saml:AttributeValue>eduPersonPrincipalName eppnNewNameForTesting</saml:AttributeValue> </saml:Attribute> ...

Transcoder Types

There are 3 built-in types of OIDC transcoders, as follows. Each one is predefined as a Spring bean for use in rules using the "short" name of the transcoder as shown.

OIDCStringTranscoder

The simplest and most commonly used transcoder, it supports encoding and decoding internal values from and to the StringAttributeValue class. It supports the following additional optional property:

Name

Type

Default