Skip to end of metadata
Go to start of metadata

You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

« Previous Version 10 Current »

Shibboleth Developer's Meeting, 2022-04-15

Call Administrivia

09:00 Central US / 10:00 Eastern US / 15:00 UK / 17:00 FI

Calls are normally the 1st and 3rd Fridays of each month. Next call would be Friday 2022-05-06. Any reason to deviate from this?

60 to 90 minute call window.

Call Details

This week's call will use the Zoom system at OSU, see dev list note from Scott.

AGENDA

  1. Release post-mortem on any needed Jenkins changes.

  2. Soliciting any ideas for Spring hardening.

  3. Take Nexus down next week?

  4. Alternative javadoc generation options?

Attendees:

Brent

  • Out on leave

Daniel

Henri

  • Minor bug-fixes for 3.1 (JOIDC-87, JOIDC-88, JOIDC-89)

  • Testing and documentation

Ian

John

  • Insignificant, incremental progress grinding out build scripts.

Marvin

Phil

  • Have been plugging in the TrustEngine into the RP for id_token and possibly user_info token validation.

    • Mocked a credential resolver, but will need a provider metadata based one, and resolved client_secret one

    • Created a few duplicate classes as e.g. existing SignatureValidationConfiguration was linked to an XML signature typed SignatureTrustEngine.

      • This was all detailed in the ticket by Scott and Brent, but I added some duplicates locally to see how it all worked.

      • Created a new id_token signature validation configuration in the OIDCSecurityConfiguration

  • Deploying stuff, so agenda items.

Rod

  • Keyring management,

  • On vacation (so apologies since I will not be at the meeting)

Scott

  • Testing

  • JSPD-1 - Getting issue details... STATUS

    • Did some playing and reading, some notes in issue.

    • Not sure at this point how valuable it would be to try and implement actual message dispatching with Spring Integration or just implement an auto-wired solution myself.

  • JOIDC-7 - Getting issue details... STATUS

    • Work on branch

    • Member expressed a more urgent need for this, so evaluating how much work it will take.

    • Lot of complex issues with this because OIDC wasn’t defined with this in mind.

Tom

Other

  • No labels