Shibboleth Developer's Meeting, December 20, 2013
Attendees:
Call Administrivia
Dial-in attendee identification.
Next call is next Friday. Any reason not to meet ?
60 to 90 minute call window.
Brent
Daniel
Ian
I'd like to get decisions on:
- Requirement for Servlet 3.0 in our V3 stack.
- Cleanest option is to just say yes. This would restrict deployment platforms for the V3 IdP.
- It might be possible to fudge it somehow, though. How much effort do we think that is worth?
- Final option would be revisit the decision to move to Spring Framework 4 and stick with Spring Framework 3 for the life of IdP V3, but I don't think we want to do that.
- Use of
@Override
. I haven't heard any objections to it on the list, but let's be clear about what we want to do; some selection or all of the following:- Change (reverse) the recommendation for the "insert
@Override
in new code" option in Eclipse? - Add a code style recommendation to include
@Override
where appropriate? - Should we do any work on any of the old code, or leave it to individual discretion?
- Should we use Checkstyle's
MissingOverride
check: "Verifies that thejava.lang.Override
annotation is present when the {@inheritDoc} javadoc tag is present."- Would probably involve quite a lot of warnings.
- Note that it is a purely textual check; Checkstyle doesn't seem to know when a method actually does override.
- There also appears to be a Java compiler preference in Eclipse which defaults to ignoring missing
@Override
which we could set globally.
- Change (reverse) the recommendation for the "insert
Rod
Scott
Tom
Other