Page Comparison

Table of Contents

Overview

OIDC deals in "claims" instead of "attributes" but the concept is the same and the AttributeResolverConfiguration and (optionally) AttributeRegistryConfiguration are used as with SAML and CAS to pull in the appropriate data and encode it into JSON in responses.

The only special consideration for OIDC is the specialized encoding requirements, which are handled (as in SAML) either via "inline" AttributeEncoders, or by defining "transcoding" rules that map between IdPAttributes and JSON-encoded claims.

An example file, conf/examples/oidc-attribute-resolver.xml, is included that contains some examples of custom encoders, definitions that match the optional "default" claim rules, and suggested starting points for producing the "sub" claim (see also OPSubClaim).

...

There are a few obvious downsides to this stateless approach. One is that, depending on the OIDC response type, the same attribute may be resolved more than once. This is particularly an issue if the resolution process is costly and the intention is only to authenticate the user. The ResultCache feature is helpful for this case.

A harder problem is when attribute resolution on the back-channel in the Token and Userinfo endpoints are unable to resolve attributes based on session/authentication/client information, as it is unavailable. This places additional requirements on the resolver configuration to fail gracefully in such cases. As an alternative, there is an encodedAttributes profile configuration property that instructs the Authorize endpoint to encode the attributes needed in later phases into the Authorization Code and/or Access Token directly, making them available to the Token and Userinfo endpoints. This naturally increases the size of the code/token but for specific cases may be tolerable.

...

Because OIDC is string-based, rather than reliant on XML and URIs for uniqueness, there are a number of arbitrary claim names that need to be avoided and will not be produced if used.

Warning

Please be aware that OAuth and OpenID are defined unsafely to leverage claim names that are strings rather than URIs. Thus, there are no mechanisms in place to ensure control and uniqueness over the naming of claims as can be done in SAML. As a result, we cannot guarantee that new specifications will not define new claim names and stomp on your use of new claim names that happen to collide.

The only real solution to this problem is simply to avoid “small/simple” names and, when using OIDC at least, avoid adding custom claims to the ID Token and leverage the UserInfo endpoint to produce them instead.

The following claim names are currently reserved (but note the warning above):

aud
iss
iat
exp
acr
auth_time
at_hash
c_hash
nonce
sid

The "sub" claim is also semi-reserved but does come from your configuration. However it has to meet certain requirements and so cannot just contain arbitrary data without risking severe consequences to RPs. It is analagous to violating the expectations of a SAML SP regarding the content of an Attribute, but with more consistently severe problems. Please refer to the dedicated page at OPSubClaim for specifics.

...

Note that it's optional and not required to "combine" SAML and OIDC rules together. The system is intelligent enough to allow multiple "outbound" rules associated with the same IdPAttribute id with different transcoders involved.

The additional supported properties and transcoder types are described below. As with SAML, OIDC includes mechanisms to request claims, and so the transcoders support bidirectional mappings to allow decoding of requested JSON claims as well as encoding of IdPAttributes into JSON.

Common Properties

In addition to the generic properties, all OIDC transcoders support the following:

Name	Type	Default	Description
oidc.name	String		The claim name to map to and from (if absent, the IdPAttribute's id is used)
oidc.asArray	Boolean	false	Encodes and decodes multiple values as a JSON array
oidc.asInteger	Boolean	false	Encodes and decodes individual values as a JSON integer
oidc.asBoolean	Boolean	false	Encodes and decodes individual values as a Boolean
oidc.stringDelimiter	String	<space>	Encodes and decodes multiple values as a string with a specifie delimiter
oidc.nameFromSamlMetadata^4.1	Boolean	false	The claim name may be set in the SAML metadata

SAML metadata-driven claim name

Since OP v4.1, the claim name may be set in the SAML metadata-driven style. If the OIDC transcoder property oidc.nameFromSamlMetadata is set to true, the metadata tag http://shibboleth.net/ns/attributes/naming/oidc can be used together with pattern <id> <name> to set a custom name for the claim.

Below is an example snippet of SAML metadata for test_rp that configures the claim name eppnNewNameForTesting for attribute with ID eduPersonPrincipalName:

Code Block

...
    <md:EntityDescriptor entityID="test_rp">
        <md:Extensions>
            <mdattr:EntityAttributes>
                <saml:Attribute Name="http://shibboleth.net/ns/attributes/naming/oidc"
                    NameFormat="urn:oasis:names:tc:SAML:2.0:attrname-format:uri">
                    <saml:AttributeValue>eduPersonPrincipalName eppnNewNameForTesting</saml:AttributeValue>
                </saml:Attribute>
...

Transcoder Types

There are 3 built-in types of OIDC transcoders, as follows. Each one is predefined as a Spring bean for use in rules using the "short" name of the transcoder as shown.

...

The simplest and most commonly used transcoder, it supports encoding and decoding internal values from and to the StringAttributeValue class. It supports the following additional optional property:

Name	Type	Default	Description
oidc.asObject	Boolean	false	Encodes and decodes a string value as a JSON object (meaning parsing to and from JSON)

OIDCScopedStringTranscoder

Supports encoding and decoding internal values from and to the ScopedStringAttributeValue class. It supports the following additional properties (all optional):

Name	Type	Default	Description
oidc.scopeDelimiter	String	@	The character(s) to use to separate the value and scope

OIDCByteTranscoder

Supports encoding and decoding internal values from and to the ByteAttributeValue class, with a base64 transform applied. It supports no additional properties.

...

The alternative to the generality of the transcoding approach is the older style of embedding <AttributeEncoder> elements within the AttributeResolverConfiguration to specify individual encoding of AttributeDefinitions to claims. This is supported for OIDC via a set of extensions that add new encoder plugin types.

Note
Note for upgraders: the older "token placement" settings that were supported here for splitting claims have been moved to profile configuration settings and are no longer valid here.

...

Namespace: urn:mace:shibboleth:2.0:resolver:oidc
Schema: http://shibboleth.net/schema/oidc/shibboleth-attribute-encoder-oidc.xsd

...

All of the extension encoders support the common settings described on the AttributeEncoderPluginConfiguration page. They also support all of these common XML attributes:

Name	Type	Default	Description
asObject	Boolean	false	Encodes (and decodes) string-valued data as a JSON object instead of a string value
asBoolean	Boolean	false	Encodes (and decodes) values as booleans (anything but "true", ignoring case, is treated as false)
asArray	Boolean	false	Encodes (and decodes) multiple values into a JSON array rather than a delimited string
asInt	Boolean	false	Encodes (and decodes) values as JSON integers (non-numeric values are ignored)
stringDelimiter	String	<space>	Sets the delimiter to use when encoding multiple values into a single JSON string

The supported xsi:type values (and additional options) are:

xsi:type	Description
oidc:OIDCString	Basic encoder for string-valued claims (defaults to encoding multiple values as a space-delimited string)
oidc:OIDCScopedString	Encoder for scoped claims. A `scopeDelimiter` XML attribute can be supplied to alter the delimiter (defaults to '@').
oidc:OIDCByte	Encoder for base64-encoding byte-valued data

Examples

The expected JSON is shown in XML comments. Unrelated aspects are omitted such as dependencies and so forth.