...
Propose we release updated 17 parent and re-lock everything to that to stablize javadoc mess
Unless we’ve decided to start leaving everything unlocked and letting dependency updates bleed into all the CI jobs?
If there are additional release profile changes we want to make, might be a good time.
Decision is to leave it all unlocked for now, and we’ll assume a full re-release next time. Patch-compatible dependencies can be updated at this point.
Overall backlog of new work / release planning
Confirmed, no outstanding V4 work right now, work on V5 is primarily feature (5.1) stuff so targeting maybe early December for that along with some minor updates to plugins for features there.
Board update
Attendees:
Brent
Jira Legacy server System JIRA serverId f52c7d31-6eab-3f0e-93c3-231b5754d506 key OSJ-388 tested their changes and our update is ready to go. xmlsec 3.0.3 was released Thurs (yesterday).
need to update xmlsec dep to 3.0.3 - wrt to the agenda topic: do in java-parent or override in opensaml-parent, etc?
Jira Legacy server System JIRA serverId f52c7d31-6eab-3f0e-93c3-231b5754d506 key OSJ-391 Can default these in TLSSocketFactory impl itself, and can be overridden either at factory-level or per-request if necessary (the latter most likely)
Minor risk is if we have any gaps where we don’t have an HttpClientSecurityParameters that can be supplied to override
Should extrapolate to cipher suites also? Maybe hardening the protocols would already limit the “bad ones” inherently.
Jira Legacy server System JIRA serverId f52c7d31-6eab-3f0e-93c3-231b5754d506 key OSJ-392 I have observations not expressed in the issue yet. No resolution yet. Summary:
I think the issue isn’t use of xsi:type per se, it’s any case where you don’t have XMLObject support for an element/type in your runtime environment, and you get an XSAny.
If I remember XML Schema esoterica correctly (maybe not), any element’s content model can be subtyped - it’s just not common. I.e. RoleDescriptor isn’t special.
<KeyDescriptor xsi:type="brent:MyAwesomeKeyDescriptorType">
- where that type is a subtype ofKeyDescriptorType
.Is a theoretical concern, maybe we just ignore and focus on the “expected” extension points.
Daniel
Nothing to report.
Henri
Jira Legacy server System JIRA serverId f52c7d31-6eab-3f0e-93c3-231b5754d506 key JOIDC-13 Propagation: found a way to control the front-channel propagation result in UI
The propagation flow calls the RP’s front-channel logout URI in yet another iframe, but proceeds itself into the similar end-state as back-channel does
RP-initiated logout:
Mostly done now, also including some initial flow tests (first flow test for me with a flow resuming from a view)
Some fine-tuning needed for id_token_hint validation (first case when OP is validating its own signatures)
TODO
Finish unit / flow tests
Tests against the conformance suite
Documentation
...
Ongoing work on javadocs
Any javadocs used by other projects are deployed now under /api
Site jobs for both branches converted to build and deploy the aggregate javadoc jar for snapshots
Significant variability encountered using the Maven options box vs. the command line box
Unable to find a simple way to get Maven to build and deploy just the javadoc, it wants to build all the code and deploy all the jars it built. This means for now the site jobs will actually deploy another snapshot. It doesn’t build all the individual javadocs like the main build profiles do, so the jobs are still pretty fast.
Release profile used by nightlies no longer include any javadoc goals, verified docs not being deployed to Nexus nightly anymore
Jira Legacy server System JIRA serverId f52c7d31-6eab-3f0e-93c3-231b5754d506 key IDP-2183 We should have some fairly self-contained ways to generate hashes needed for inline scripts
Straddles the bug/enhancement line vis a vis when/how to release changes, OTOH a minor update is “freeing”
Jira Legacy server System JIRA serverId f52c7d31-6eab-3f0e-93c3-231b5754d506 key OSJ-392 Jira Legacy server System JIRA serverId f52c7d31-6eab-3f0e-93c3-231b5754d506 key IDP-2187 A regression but does not break (proper) upgrades (i.e., you know it’s going to bite people)
Tom
Jira Legacy server System JIRA serverId f52c7d31-6eab-3f0e-93c3-231b5754d506 key GEN-333
Problem beingbin/install.sh
is not being made executable if thesign-snapshots
profile is active
Cause seems to be that Maven plugins (in this case maven-antrun-plugin) are called once with multiple executions
So activating thesign-snapshots
plugin callsmake-files-in-bin-executable
after the assembly is built
Workarounds ? maybe use the assembly plugin to change the filemode
...