Page Comparison

...

• At this stage, we’re not planning to refactor any of the code in either source repository. We may do that later to disaggregate the current java-supportartifact.

• At this stage, we’re not trying to make this into a multi-module project. We do want to do that longer term, with the assumption being that we’d put the pom.xml into the root directory of this new repository, in the way we’ve done with the MDA and some of the plugin repositories, rather than the side-by-side scheme we used in the IdP and OpenSAML.

• We don’t intend to use this new merged repository to rebuild historic versions of the artifacts, or to do any necessary maintenance on previous versions (however, there’s no reason to make it impossible, either). There’s no current intention to remove the old repositories, and that work can be done there.

• Initially, we’re leaving the file names and Maven coordinates for the two artifacts generated as they are. Longer term, we want to rename those because their current names aren’t well chosen. I’m assuming that we want to change from java-support to shib-support and from spring-extensions to shib-spring.

• To align with that, the histories for the two source repositories are moved into sub-directories with those names (shib-support and shib-spring).

• The GPG/PGP signatures have been stripped from all signed tags. It’s not possible to perform any of the surgery required and preserve these as functional signatures, and removing them seems better than leaving them intact but non-functional.

...