Shibboleth Developer's Meeting, 2016-08-05
Call Administrivia
10:00 Central US / 11:00 Eastern US / 16:00 UK
Calls are normally the 1st and 3rd Fridays of each month. Next call would be Friday 2016-08-19. Any reason to deviate from this?
60 to 90 minute call window.
This week's call will use the Lync system at OSU. To participate, call:
- +1 (614) 688-1800 (please use if possible)
- +1 (800) 678-6114 (use only if you're charged for the 614 number)
The Conference ID is: 738127#
International participants should be able to access the 800 number without charge through Skype.
AGENDA
- Flattening the IdP attribute resolver namespaces? ... Or redo dependenices? .. Or neither?... or both?
- TIER packaging direction
- U2F approach
- 3.3 timing/scope
- Source/target 1.8? Are any other dependencies at risk of moving there? Spring?
- Token binding and SAML – mandatory vs. optional semantics
Attendees:
Brent
Daniel
Ian
Marvin
...
- Completed MFA work and documentation, review welcome, suggestions on what to include as a default example
- Completed Duo work, pending what to do about failure modes
- Started looking at U2F, added to agenda
- BouncyCastle mess – uploaded cryptacular 1.1.1-SNAPSHOT
- should I just check in updated POMs overriding the versions for now?
- BouncyCastle mess – uploaded cryptacular 1.1.1-SNAPSHOT
- libcurl advisory – conclusion we're not impacted
Tom
- Some notes from the field :
- Somewhere on the wiki regarding next steps after installation we probably should document configuration of conf/access-control.xml to enable scripts such as bin/reload-service.sh. My guess is that deployers will be adding the IP address that the IdP is listening on. Then they need to wait 5m for the automatic reload before being able to use the scripts. Makes me think that we could add an option to CLI.java to select the source address, for example localhost, since access from localhost is allowed by default.
- I wonder if it is possible or worthwhile to be able to add a new metadata provider without reloading the existing providers, such as a large federation aggregate, for example. Maybe it could be done by nesting large metadata aggregates in their own Spring ApplicationContext as a child of some common context of the MetadataResolver. Or maybe the minute or two it takes to load large metadata aggregates is a non-issue for folks or merely a local issue.
Other